United States v. Beal
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
James Beal appeals his judgment of conviction and sentence. The parties have expressly waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In May 2001, Beal pleaded guilty to four counts of assaulting federal employees in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1). The district court concluded that Beal’s conduct significantly disrupted a government function (USSG § 5K2.7) and that his conduct was unusually degrading to his victims (USSG § 5K2.8), and it departed upward from the recommended guidelines range by one level under each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Michael Davis (96-5895) and Miles Jones (96-5905)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Mitchell Frederick PasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Chaston Cross (96-5218) Perry Thomas (96-5219)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Victor Shunta Baker (01-6260) Henry Lee Tate, Jr. (01-6313) and Jason Brian Patterson (01-6314)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003