Schroeder Company v. Coates
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Pietrykowski, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} This consolidated appeal is before the court following the July 29, 2006 judgments of the Toledo Municipal Court that found that plaintiff-appellee, Schroeder Company, was entitled to restitution of the separate apartment units rented by defendants-appellants, Doniesha Coates and Jeannine Ragland, based upon late rental payments. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
{¶ 2} The facts of this case are as follows. Appellee, Schroeder Company (“Schroeder”), is an Ohio corporation doing business as Norwich Apartments and Byrneport…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Southern Hotel Co. v. Miscott, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Lauch v. MonningOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
- Bates & Springer, Inc. v. NayOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Palmer Gardens v. RodgersOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Woda Mgt. & Real Estate, L.L.C. v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Byrneport Apts. II v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- New Sunrise Properties v. RobertsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026