Legal Opinion

Schroeder Company v. Coates

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2007No. Nos. L-06-1277 and L-06-1278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pietrykowski, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} This consolidated appeal is before the court following the July 29, 2006 judgments of the Toledo Municipal Court that found that plaintiff-appellee, Schroeder Company, was entitled to restitution of the separate apartment units rented by defendants-appellants, Doniesha Coates and Jeannine Ragland, based upon late rental payments. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.

{¶ 2} The facts of this case are as follows. Appellee, Schroeder Company (“Schroeder”), is an Ohio corporation doing business as Norwich Apartments and Byrneport…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Hotel Co. v. Miscott, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Lauch v. MonningOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Bates & Springer, Inc. v. NayOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Palmer Gardens v. RodgersOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Woda Mgt. & Real Estate, L.L.C. v. GrantOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Byrneport Apts. II v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. New Sunrise Properties v. RobertsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API