Legal Opinion
Brown v. Wingard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 30, 1970No. 45488PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, Judge.
1. After a verdict, the evidence is construed in its light most favorable to the prevailing party, for every presumption and inference is in favor of the verdict. Wren v. State, 57 Ga. App. 641, 644 (196 SE 146); Southern R. Co. v. Brock, 132 Ga. 858, 862 (64 SE 1083); Stapleton v. Amerson, 96 Ga. App. 471 (5) (100 SE2d 628); Young Men’s Christian Assn. v. Bailey, 112 Ga. App. 684, 690 (146 SE2d 324); Boatright v. Rich’s, Inc., 121 Ga. App. 121 (1) (173 SE2d 232).
2. The testimony of an unimpeached witness should be considered and not arbitrarily disregarded, but this does not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. HobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Boatright v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Wren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Southern Railway Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. NutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Smith v. PoteetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Jarrett v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Corrosion Control, Inc. v. William Armstrong Smith Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Gunter v. LogueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.