Legal Opinion

Griner v. Lindsey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 10, 1954No. 18558Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sutton, Justice.

1. Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial complains of the charge: “General reputation in the neighborhood shall be evidence as to ancient land marks of more than thirty years’ standing; and acquiescence for seven years, by acts or declarations, of adjoining land-owners, shall establish a dividing line. In other words, gentlemen, acquiescence by acts or declarations of adjoining landowners shall establish a dividing line.”

The criticism is that this excerpt from the charge was erroneous because: (a) it was confusing, conflicting, and as a whole stated an incorrect…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Siegel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Hoxie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Tietjen v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Barfield v. BirrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Williamson v. PratherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API