Griner v. Lindsey
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sutton, Justice.
1. Special ground 1 of the amended motion for new trial complains of the charge: “General reputation in the neighborhood shall be evidence as to ancient land marks of more than thirty years’ standing; and acquiescence for seven years, by acts or declarations, of adjoining land-owners, shall establish a dividing line. In other words, gentlemen, acquiescence by acts or declarations of adjoining landowners shall establish a dividing line.”
The criticism is that this excerpt from the charge was erroneous because: (a) it was confusing, conflicting, and as a whole stated an incorrect…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Siegel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Hoxie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Tietjen v. DobsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Barfield v. BirrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Williamson v. PratherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.