Legal Opinion

Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 24, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract to recover charges for the support of certain inmates of State institutions upon the ground that, as such inmates each had a legal settlement in Boston, that city, under the provisions of G. L. c. Ill, § 66, is hable to the plaintiff as State Treasurer for the amount of such charges. The declaration contained twenty-three counts, each relating to a claim against the defendant for the support of an inmate. The case is before this court on a reservation and report made by a judge of the Superior Court upon an agreed statement of facts. The questions of law to be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lámar v. MicouSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Inhabitants of Dedham v. Inhabitants of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  3. Horgan v. Pacific MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. City of Somerville v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. Treasurer & Receiver General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Treasurer & Receiver General v. Town of DedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. City of Brockton v. Town of ConwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Town of Dedham v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Treasurer & Receiver General v. Town of NatickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API