Legal Opinion

Carrabba v. Randalls Food Markets, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 13, 2002No. 4:96-cv-00651PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

MCBRYDE, District Judge.

Before the court for consideration and decision are the requests for relief made in the document filed November 9, 2001, titled “Class Counsel’s Amended Application for Common Fund Recovery.” For the reasons given below, the court has concluded no attorneys’ fees should be paid from the common fund, that the common fund should bear certain of the unreim-bursed expenses incurred by the attorneys for the class, and that the named plaintiffs/class representatives should not receive bonus, incentive, or expense reimbursement payments from the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. National Association of Government Employees v. City Public Service Board of San Antonio, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  5. Walker v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Immune Response Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
  2. Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
  3. Humphrey v. United Way of the Texas Gulf CoastDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
  4. Brundle ex rel. Constellis Employee Stock Ownership Plan v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API