Legal Opinion

Holmquist v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1995No. 94-305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

Appellant Marson Holmquist appeals from a conviction for first degree sexual assault, claiming that he was denied due process during his sentencing. We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear this appeal and dismiss.

Appellant did not notify the public defender’s office that he wished to prosecute an appeal until five days after the thirty-day time limit had expired. See W.R.A.P. 2.01. The public defender then filed a notice of appeal on the same day appellant made his wish known. The district court denied appellant’s Motion to Extend Time for Filing Appeal, finding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McElreath v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of CFWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. TPJ v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Interest of BW v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API