Legal Opinion

State v. Dennehy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 4, 1985No. 84-409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The defendant appeals from her convictions on charges involving conspiracy and theft by misapplication, as well as from the denial of her motion for a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error and affirm.

Yvonne Dennehy was indicted for theft by misapplication of property, under RSA 637:10, and conspiracy to commit theft by misapplication of property, under RSA 629:3. These charges arose out of the alleged misuse during 1979 and the early part of 1980 of the money of investors in the First Cable Investment'!-Group (First Cable), a limited partnership which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. FaragiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State v. BirdSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MacElmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  2. State v. CyrsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. State v. LetendreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. State v. SettleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API