Crockett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McCLOUD, Commissioner.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for the misdemeanor offense of attempting to obtain a dangerous drug, to-wit: Talwin, by use of a forged prescription. Punishment was assessed by the jury at thirty days in jail and a fine of $500.00.
Appellant contends the information was fundamentally defective because Talwin was not listed as a “dangerous drug” in Section 2, Article 726d, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., at the time of the alleged offense. 1 We agree.
The information alleges that appellant on or about November 26, 1971, attempted to obtain a “dangerous drug, to-wit: Talwin” by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Hayslip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Joe Rollen Crockett v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.