Legal Opinion

Crockett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided July 17, 1974No. 48507PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCLOUD, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for the misdemeanor offense of attempting to obtain a dangerous drug, to-wit: Talwin, by use of a forged prescription. Punishment was assessed by the jury at thirty days in jail and a fine of $500.00.

Appellant contends the information was fundamentally defective because Talwin was not listed as a “dangerous drug” in Section 2, Article 726d, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., at the time of the alleged offense. 1 We agree.

The information alleges that appellant on or about November 26, 1971, attempted to obtain a “dangerous drug, to-wit: Talwin” by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Hayslip v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Joe Rollen Crockett v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API