Scheidlinger v. Power
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkewich, J.
By stipulation, the only question left for the court is the petitioner’s claim that the omission of the word “ then ” in the “ Statement of Witness ” appended to the designating petitions constitutes a vital defect. The “ Statement of Witness ” referred to is that prescribed hy statute (Election Law, § 135) to he made in substance hy subscribing witnesses to designating petitions. Its present form requires the witness to state where he “ now ” resides and in what election district such residence is located; the witness must state further in what year he “ was last registered for the general…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Rimkus v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023