Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Shaw
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1912No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Kent; Cogger, J., presiding. Assumpsit by William H. Freeman against Nelson A. Shaw and another for the value of services rendered by plaintiff’s minor son. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
In justice’s court plaintiff declared on the common counts and specially for work and labor of his minor son. His bill of particulars was:
“Personal work and labor of Claude Freeman, minor son of said plaintiff, from March 1,1910, to April 11,1911, 58 weeks at $4 per week, #232.”
On appeal from the judgment of the justice, the cause was tried with a jury. A verdict was returned for plaintiff for #182.50, upon which a judgment was entered.
The brief of appellants does not contain a clear and concise, or any considerable, statement of the facts of the case, distinct from argument, of the errors…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reeder v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Potter v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Lincoln v. Detroit & Mackinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Sassaman v. WellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913