Legal Opinion
Manufacturers Railways Co. v. RIVERWAY HARBOR
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided October 7, 1986No. 86-781A(B)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
646 F.Supp. 796 (1986)
MANUFACTURERS RAILWAYS COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
RIVERWAY HARBOR SERVICE ST. LOUIS, INC., a corporation, Defendant.
No. 86-781A(B).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
October 7, 1986.
Nick Lamb, Thompson & Mitchell, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Robert Nienhaus, Goldstein & Price, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
REGAN, District Judge.
This is an admiralty action before the Court for final judgment after trial before the Court without a jury. Plaintiff, Manufacturers Railway Company (MRC) seeks to recover damages from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Freeport Sulphur Company v. The S/s Hermosa, Her Engines, Tackle, Apparel, Furniture, Etc., in Rem, Pansuiza Compania De Navigacion S.A., in PersonamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States Rubber Company v. Eugene BauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Patterson Oil Terminals, Inc. v. Port CovingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Schwerman Trucking Co., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Gartland Steamship Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Chicago v. M/v Morgan, Kindra Lake Towing, L.P., and Kindra Lake Towing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- American Petrofina Pipeline Co. v. M/V Shoko MaruCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- American Petrofina Pipeline Company v. M/V Shoko MaruCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Houston Casualty Co., et al. v. Ambitious Line SA, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- M/V Morgan v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004