Legal Opinion

(HC) Bailey v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 26, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01087Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRENT EUGENE BAILEY, No. 2:23-cv-01087-KJM-EFB (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner proceeds without counsel in this petition for writ of habeas under 28 U.S.C. 18 § 2241. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 as provided by 28 U.S.C. 19 § 636(b)(1). Petitioner alleges he is entitled to relief because there has been an intervening 20 change in the interpretation of statutory law. See generally Pet., ECF No. 1. 21 On April 24, 2024, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. HendrixSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API