Legal Opinion

Property & Casualty Insurance v. Clarke

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert Kramer, J.

Under what circumstances is an automobile insurer that is not authorized to do business in New York and has no contacts in New York deemed to have provided coverage for injuries to a claimant injured in an accident with its insured?

Respondent allegedly sustained personal injuries when a vehicle, owned by Pennsylvania resident Alexander M. Joyner, registered in Pennsylvania, insured by a Pennsylvania insurer (hereinafter Safe Auto) and driven by a sibling of the owner (Mark A. Joyner), made a left turn in front of respondent’s car causing a collision. Safe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Central Mutual Insurance v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. General Accident Insurance v. TranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Am. Trucking & Transp. Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API