Bloom v. Jaffe
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment entered in the Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, second district, in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff is a physician who apparently furnished medical services to an injured work*223man. It was conceded at the trial that the workmen’s compensation commission fixed the physician’s compensation at twenty-one dollars. Apparently the parties meant by this concession that the commission approved a claim for services of this amount and included it in the award to the workman, as provided by section 24 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. It is not expressly conceded, but it is quite apparent, that the defendant was the employer of the injured workman. The employee has assigned the award, or…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendrick Memorial HospitalTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Hendricks Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Munson v. ChristieMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Louis Bossert & Sons, Inc. v. Piel Bros.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.