In re Colgate Optic White Toothpaste Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in a Northern District of California action (Vigil) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation concerning the marketing of Colgate Optic White toothpastes in the Southern District of New York. This litigation currently consists of three actions list*1347ed on Schedule A and pending in three districts. Defendant Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Colgate) supports centralization in the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in the Southern District of New York (Ca-nale) and the Central District of California action (Dean), who are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
- The Cadle Company v. Whataburger of Alice, Inc. M. Louise Andrews Kathy A. Reese Herbert E. Pounds, Jr. George P. Braun and Joe Alvin Andrews, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Fire Eagle L.L.C. v. Bischoff (In Re Spillman Development Group, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. CordovaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2010