Stripling v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The order denying appellant’s motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. As to the second issue, defendant was properly convicted of armed robbery under section 812.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). The State need only show that defendant’s participation in the crime satisfied section 777.011, Florida Statutes (1989). The State need not show that defendant personally possessed the firearm. See id.; State v. McQuay, 403 So.2d 566, 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Norris v. State, 360 So.2d 476 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).*
Affirmed.
A different rule applies where section 775.087, Florida Statutes, is used to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Earnest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- State v. McQuayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Stripling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Byron Turner v. the State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Carswell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995