Legal Opinion

Asbestos Trading & Finance Co. v. Hazen

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtLydon, J.

This is a motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Judgment is sought against the defendant Hazen only. The other defendant, Asbestos Limited, Inc., has not been served and has not appeared in the action. The action is predicated on a trade acceptance which the complaint alleges was duly made, executed, accepted and delivered for value by the defendant George Hazen, and so accepted delivered to the other defendant, Asbestos Limited, Inc., who duly and for value and before maturity indorsed the said trade acceptance and delivered it so indorsed to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vosburgh v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Security Bank & Trust Co. v. DeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API