Legal Opinion
McSweeney v. Buti
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 18, 1994No. 1-92-1229PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
637 N.E.2d 420 (1994)
263 Ill.App.3d 955
201 Ill.Dec. 831
Clarice I. McSWEENEY, Donald N. Brown and Charles H.G. Kimball individually and d/b/a WSSB Partnership, an Illinois partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Kenneth J. BUTI and Carl Weilding individually and as partners of the Buti, Weilding and McSweeney, an Illinois partnership, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 1-92-1229.
Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division.
April 25, 1994.
Denial of Rehearing As Modified on July 18, 1994.
Office of Di Monte & Lizak, Park Ridge (Chester A. Lizak and G.F. Gallagher, of counsel), for appellant.
Offi…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Manning.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Finley v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- McDunn v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ZarkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Daley v. StrayhornIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Peskin v. DeutschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sigmund Lefkovitz v. Nathan Wagner, and Jarnis United Properties Co., Proposed Intervenor-Appellant, and Grippo & Elden, and 29-31 AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Southwest Whey, Inc. v. Nutrition 101, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001
- Lefkovitz, Sigmund v. Wagner, NathanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005