Thornton v. Rhodus Mobile Homes, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Webber
This appeal raises as its principal issue whether a bank account, commonly called a “reserve account,” is subject to garnishment.
Plaintiffs obtained a judgment against defendant Rhodus Mobile Homes, Inc. (Rhodus), and then instituted garnishment proceedings against the garnishee McLean County Bank (Bank). The circuit court of McLean County entered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Bank, which appeals. We reverse.
Some background, as developed by testimony at the garnishment hearing, is necessary to an understanding of the issue. From what has been said in the briefs before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Town & Country Bank v. James M. Canfield Contracting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Freeport Journal-Standard Publishing Co. v. Frederic W. Ziv Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
- National Home, Inc. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- Pressed Steel Equipment Co. v. Thornburgh Pressteel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jaffe Commercial Finance Co. v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Lange v. FreundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- People v. ManningAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Lange v. FreundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006