Humphries v. Wiley
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice
(after stating the case as above).
The appellants prefeent the point of error in canceling the deed of May 21, 1931, conveying a one-half undivided interest in the oil and other minerals under the six acres of land. The granting clause of the deed designates as a grantee “the said 0. M. E. Church, and (naming nine individuals) as Trustees of Cool Spring Colored Methodist Church of the County of Smith, State of-Texas”; the habendum clause names “the said C. M. E. Church” and “Trustees of the ■Cool Spring Methodist Church”; and in the warranty clause it runs: “The said Trustees of the Cool…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilbur v. AlmySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wisdom v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Methodist Episcopal Church South v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Hicks v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Crawford v. El Paso Land Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rife v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Browning v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Perry v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Parrish v. LooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Friendship Baptist Dist. Ass'n v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.