Legal Opinion

Humphries v. Wiley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1934No. 4582PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The appellants prefeent the point of error in canceling the deed of May 21, 1931, conveying a one-half undivided interest in the oil and other minerals under the six acres of land. The granting clause of the deed designates as a grantee “the said 0. M. E. Church, and (naming nine individuals) as Trustees of Cool Spring Colored Methodist Church of the County of Smith, State of-Texas”; the habendum clause names “the said C. M. E. Church” and “Trustees of the ■Cool Spring Methodist Church”; and in the warranty clause it runs: “The said Trustees of the Cool…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilbur v. AlmySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Wisdom v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Methodist Episcopal Church South v. CliftonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Hicks v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Crawford v. El Paso Land Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rife v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Browning v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  3. Perry v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Parrish v. LooneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Friendship Baptist Dist. Ass'n v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API