Legal Opinion

United Ossining Party v. Hayduk

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 1, 1971No. 71 Civ. 3849PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

Under attack in this action is the recently enacted amendment of the New York Election Law, § 138-b, Chapter 1179 of the Laws of New York 1971, which became effective on July 6, 1971. It places certain restrictions on cross-endorsements of candidates for public office, i. e., the nomination and appearance on the ballot of a person as a candidate of both (1) a political party and (2) an independent group or body. The Election Law, § 2, defines a “party” as “any political organization which at the last preceding election for governor polled at least fifty thousand votes…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination Certificate of StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. In re Nomination Certificate of T. Milton StreetCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Fortune v. Kings County Democratic County CommitteeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  4. United States v. LouisianaDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1997
  5. United States v. State of La.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API