Legal Opinion

State v. Claypool

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 2, 2002No. 20362-0-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Interest on financial obligations arising from a defendant’s judgment and sentence begins to accrue on the date judgment is entered. RCW 10.82.090. Here, the trial court imposed financial obligations on Dean Claypool after he pleaded guilty to second degree assault. But the court deferred the accrual of interest until his release from custody. We reverse because the statute’s mandate is clear. *475The trial court, therefore, lacked the authority to defer the accrual of interest.

FACTS

Dean Claypool pleaded guilty to second degree assault as part of a plea agreement. The trial court accepted his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. A.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ClaypoolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Aguirre v. AT&T Wireless Services Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. State of Washington v. Taylor Ross LandrumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API