Legal Opinion
Saraceno v. Capitol Theatre Realty Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment determining, pursuant to § 33-384 of the General Statutes, the value of their shares in a corporation. The twenty-two assignments of error, which in turn embrace sixteen subdivisions, assert, in substance, that the court erred in correcting and accepting, as corrected, a report of appraisers and in failing and refusing to permit the plaintiffs to offer evidence at a hearing on the acceptance of the appraisers’ report.
The plaintiffs, as shareholders in the defendant corporation, brought this action, seeking a receiver for, and a dissolution of, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- National Folding Box Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. LenczykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Wagner v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Garofalo v. ArgravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harbor Construction Corporation v. DV Frione & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- New Haven Savings Bank v. General Finance & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Spears v. Kerars Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Martin v. Connecticut Personnel CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. CadouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.