Legal Opinion

Viking Press, Inc. v. Goldman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 8, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

The plaintiff sued the Postmaster of New York, N. Y., for a permanent injunction and moved for a restraining order pendente lite. After the defendant had moved for a summary judgment, before answer, Rule 56 (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, plaintiff served a second amended complaint. By consent of the parties the motion is to be deemed directed to plaintiff’s last pleading. Plaintiff has also served a cross motion for summary judgment which does not accord with Rule 56 (a) as no answer has been served. If the defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Warner Valley Stock Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Gnerich v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. National Conference on Legalizing Lotteries, Inc. v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. Alcohol Warehouse Corporation v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Krug v. Santa Fe Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  2. United States v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API