Viking Press, Inc. v. Goldman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
The plaintiff sued the Postmaster of New York, N. Y., for a permanent injunction and moved for a restraining order pendente lite. After the defendant had moved for a summary judgment, before answer, Rule 56 (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, plaintiff served a second amended complaint. By consent of the parties the motion is to be deemed directed to plaintiff’s last pleading. Plaintiff has also served a cross motion for summary judgment which does not accord with Rule 56 (a) as no answer has been served. If the defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Warner Valley Stock Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Gnerich v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- National Conference on Legalizing Lotteries, Inc. v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Alcohol Warehouse Corporation v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Krug v. Santa Fe Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- United States v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942