Legal Opinion

Grissel v. Bank of Woonsocket

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from circuit court, Sanborn county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action to recover on deposit account. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover $400 claimed to be due him on his deposit account with said bank. The defendant bank, prior to the commencement of this action, had applied the balance due plaintiff on his deposit account to the payment of a certain note executed by the plaintiff to the defendant on or about the 4th day of June, 1892, for the sum of $560,- upon which there was paid December 31, 1892, the sum of $206.41. The defendant alleges in its answer that on or about the 13th day *95of September, 1894, the defendant and the plaintiff had a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. SearcySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  2. Williams v. HartshornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Roach v. ParcellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  4. Rapp v. GiddingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Miles v. DouglasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API