Robinson v. Wampold-Loeb Shoe Co.

BRIOKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appellee sued appellant for the sum of $200 due by account. The trial below resulted in a verdict for plaintiff and judgment thereon was accordingly rendered.

Appellant assigns several grounds of error, hut the main insistence appears to be (1) that the appellee (plaintiff) failed to make out a prima facie case as to the account sued upon, and (2) also failed to show the liability of this appellant.

AVe do not accord to either of these insistences. On the latter proposition (2), tlie Supreme Court it appears has determined this question in the case of Robinson (same…