Coppes v. Keystone Paint & Filler Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 8, March T., 1908, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Lycoming Co., June T., 1906, No. 4, on bill in equity in case of J. A. Coppes et al. v. The Keystone Paint & Filler Company. Bill in equity to reform a deed. Before Hart, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was decree reforming the deed.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bt
Morrison, J.,
The learned court below entered a final decree reforming a deed for the conveyance ■ of land from the defendant corporation to one of the plaintiffs, by striking out of the deed the ■■ following restriction, placed therein by the officers of the cor■poration before executing the deed, to wit: “But this conveyance is made on condition that neither said lands, nor any building now on, or hereafter erected on said lands shall ever be used for the business, manufacture, storage or sale of paint, paints, filler, fillers, or used in carrying on any or either of said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ShaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Boyce v. Hamburg-Bremen Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Cooper v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Youngstown Electric Light Co. v. Butler County Poor DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Bierman v. Lebanon Valley CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Waslee v. RossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Bosler v. Sun Oil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Seaboard Radio Broadcasting Corp. v. YasskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Marmon Phila. Co. v. BlocksomSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Anderson v. Juanita Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.