Klein v. Gaston De Paris, Inc.

Opinion by

Baodrige, J.,

The plaintiff in his cause of action averred that the defendant, a foreign corporation, “has property and choses in action located in the State of Pennsylvania.'’’

We regard the averment as fatally defective, not, however, for the failure to aver that the defendant had no agent within the Commonwealth upon whom process could be served, which was the view taken by the learned court below. A resident of another state who has an agent or clerk in his place of business in this Commonwealth is not exempt from process of foreign attachment (Chase v. The Ninth National Bank of…