Legal Opinion

Giles v. Austin

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided March 15, 1873PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

If this was a re-entry sought to be enforced on account of the non-payment of rent to the landlord, there would be no difficulty in determining whether equitable relief could be afforded the tenant, and he be relieved from the forfeitures occasioned by his breach of the covenants in the lease, as compensation could yet be made to the landlord by ordering the payment to him of the amount with interest, and by the imposition of such other terms as would be just and equitable. Although the obligation is in his favor, yet the taxes and assessments, which the tenant failed to meet, when due and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rector, Etc., of Trinity Church v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Garner v. HannahThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
  3. Tibbs v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Semple v. SchwarzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API