United States v. Case Library
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
The questions about to be decided arise in proceedings by the United States to condemn a public street of the city of Cleveland for post-office purposes. The la_d was conveyed to the city by Leonard Case “as and for a street.” The heirs of Case, made parties to the proceedings, claim compensation for the fee in the street, on the ground — First, that the fee in the land never passed from their ancestor, but only an easement; and, sec*513ond. (hat, even if a fee passed, it reverts, on termination of the use for which it was conveyed.
Mv conclusions I must state most briefly, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1849
- Board of Com'rs v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Verplanck v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ash v. City of Omaha Ex Rel. PentzienNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
- Neil v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916