Legal Opinion

United States v. Case Library

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided December 7, 1899No. 5,943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAFT, Circuit Judge.

The questions about to be decided arise in proceedings by the United States to condemn a public street of the city of Cleveland for post-office purposes. The la_d was conveyed to the city by Leonard Case “as and for a street.” The heirs of Case, made parties to the proceedings, claim compensation for the fee in the street, on the ground — First, that the fee in the land never passed from their ancestor, but only an easement; and, sec*513ond. (hat, even if a fee passed, it reverts, on termination of the use for which it was conveyed.

Mv conclusions I must state most briefly, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barton v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Board of Com'rs v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Verplanck v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ash v. City of Omaha Ex Rel. PentzienNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Neil v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API