Legal Opinion
Cronin v. O'Leary
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. 001713FPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
The plaintiffs, Christine Cronin, Robert Roe, Nury Nieves, and John Christian, filed suit on April 24, 2000 claiming that a rule issued by the Executive Office of Health and Human Services (“EOHHS”) known as Procedure No. 001 was issued in violation of the Massachusetts Administrative Procedure Act, G.L.c. 30A, §§1, 3, 5, and 6, deprived them of liberty and property without due process of law, and violated their right to equal protection and substantive due process. The plaintiffs now move for partial summary judgment as to these claims.
The motion for partial summary judgment appears to seek…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stetson v. Town of AshlandMassachusetts Superior Court · 2008