Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Nixon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1856PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Upshur. Heard before the Hon. W. W. Morris. There was no statement of facts or bill of exceptions on the motion to reinstate.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Oh. J.

This suit was instituted by C. S. White-man, a citizen of Tennessee, and who, having departed this life, is represented by the appellant. The suit was dismissed at the Fall Term, 1854, a part of the history of which is detailed in the following bill of exceptions, viz : This cause being regularly called, the defendants moved the Court to dismiss the cause for want of prosecution and for want of security for costs which had not been given, which motion was sustained by the Court for want of security for costs. A short time after, a letter was received from one of the attorneys…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sandback v. QuigleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
  2. Hurst v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milam County v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Miraglia v. BrysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Harrison v. McMurrayTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Humphrey v. Beaumont Irrigating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  5. Garcia v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API