Legal Opinion

Holman v. State ex rel. Gibson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1886No. 12,111PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

The State, by an information in the nature of a quo warranto, charged that William J. Holman and ten others were assuming to act as a corporation under the name of the Fort Wayne, Warren and Brazil Railway Company; that, as such corporation, they were making contracts, incurring debts, soliciting aid from townships, -towns and cities, making surveys, appropriating lands, etc., without any warrant or authority of law. They were challenged to show by what authority they assumed so to act.

By a special answer the defendants admitted they were acting as a railway corporation, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Miller v. Wild Cat Gravel Road Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Sleeth v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coffin v. RansdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Floyd v. State ex rel. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Shick v. Citizens' Enterprise Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Positype Corp. of America v. MahinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. Clow v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API