Holmes v. Holmes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.
Under the Alimony Reform Act of 2011, St. 2011, c. 124 (reform act), “[i]f the length of the marriage is [twenty] years or less, but more than [fifteen] years, general term alimony shall continue for not more than [eighty] per cent of the number of months of the marriage” unless the judge makes a written finding that deviation beyond this time limit is required in the interest of justice. G. L. c. 208, § 49 (b) (4). The issue presented in this case is whether alimony paid under a temporary support order during the pendency of a divorce proceeding, pursuant to G. L. c. 208, § 17 (temporary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Pierce v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Moore v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Baird v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Wallace v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Chin v. MerriotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Zaleski v. ZaleskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Duff-Kareores v. KareoresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Rodman v. RodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Hassey v. HasseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.