Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Holmes

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 2, 2014PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.

Under the Alimony Reform Act of 2011, St. 2011, c. 124 (reform act), “[i]f the length of the marriage is [twenty] years or less, but more than [fifteen] years, general term alimony shall continue for not more than [eighty] per cent of the number of months of the marriage” unless the judge makes a written finding that deviation beyond this time limit is required in the interest of justice. G. L. c. 208, § 49 (b) (4). The issue presented in this case is whether alimony paid under a temporary support order during the pendency of a divorce proceeding, pursuant to G. L. c. 208, § 17 (temporary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Pierce v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Moore v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Baird v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Wallace v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Chin v. MerriotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Zaleski v. ZaleskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Duff-Kareores v. KareoresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Rodman v. RodmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  5. Hassey v. HasseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API