Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Tarman v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Clark county; the Hon. H. R. Snavely, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The county court of Clark county overruled objections of the appellant, the Cincinnati, Indianapolis-and Western Railway Company, to the application for judgment against its property for a hard road tax of $308.24 in the town of Casey. The court entered judgment with order of sale, and the appellant prosecuted this appeal.

The- first complaint of appellant is that the proof of publication of notice that application for judgment would be made was insufficient. The law provides for giving notice by publication for the purpose of giving to the court jurisdiction of the person of the owner against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. PinckneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People ex rel. Lee v. Kankakee & Seneca RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People ex rel. Rea v. Cairo, Vincennes & Chicago Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People ex rel. Owen v. Cincinnati, Lafayette & Chicago Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Acme Markets, Inc. v. CallananIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People ex rel. Dorris v. LeTemptIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People ex rel. Freedenberger v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People ex rel. Heikes v. JonkmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Marteeny v. LouthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API