Legal Opinion

Kalodner v. Bodman

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 4, 2006No. 2005-1310Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Philip P. Kalodner responds to the court’s September 13, 2006 order directing him to respond concerning whether we should dismiss his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The Secretary of Energy et al. respond in support of dismissal.*

Kalodner filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking payment of attorney fees from a common fund based on his efforts as counsel in previous litigation. Kalodner v. Abraham, No. 05-0024, 2005 WL 354483 (Jan. 26, 2005). The district court noted that Kalodner based his request on the *834Equal Access to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Exxon Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Spencer AbrahamCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API