Haleck v. TRT, Inc.
High Court of American Samoa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL FROM REPRESENTING BOTH CORPORATE AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
The Plaintiffs, shareholders of Defendant TRT, Inc. (“TRT”), brought a shareholder’s derivative suit alleging, inter alia, that Defendant Agaoleatu Tautolo (“Agaoleatu”), a director of both TRT and Defendant American Samoa 2000, Inc. (“AS2000”), breached his fiduciary duty to *135the corporations.1 They now move to disqualify the attorneys from representing both the corporations and the individual defendants, as directors of the corporations.
I. BACKGROUND
For purposes of this motion a little…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cannon v. US Acoustics CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Rowen v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Lewis v. Shaffer Stores CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- In Re Oracle Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.