Gehin v. Wisconsin Group Insurance Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.
¶ 155. {dissenting). Luann Gehin is a sympathetic figure, but her victory in this court comes at a heavy cost. My purpose in this dissent is to illuminate that cost.
¶ 156. The dissent is divided into three parts. Section I laments the majority's decision to take Wisconsin out of the mainstream of administrative law and predicts some of the consequences that will flow from the decision. Section II challenges the majority’s interpretation of a key piece of evidence in the record. Section III outlines the majority's disturbing disregard of the waiver issue and the standard procedures of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hagenkord v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Folding Furniture Works, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.