Yana Anderson v. Ochsner Health System and Ochsner Clinic Foundation
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentGuidry, Justice
LI respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the legislature intended, albeit implicitly, to allow a private right of action under the Health Care and Consumer Billing and Disclosure Protection Act, La.Rev.Stat. 22:1871 et seq. (more com*587monly referred to as the “Balance Billing Act”). In my view, the majority inordinately focuses on what the legislature did not do, that is expressly disallow a private right of action, rather than on what the legislature actually did. There is no doubt that the legislature perceived a problem with improper billing practices and sought to prohibit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Borden-Aicklen Auto Supply Co. v. Folse Service StationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Cheramie Services, Inc. v. Shell Deepwater Production, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Voltolina v. St. Tammany Fire Dist. 12Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Monier v. St. Charles Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011