Williams v. State

• Orth, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The two questions on this appeal from judgments entered against Lawrence Williams at a court trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore go to the sufficiency of the •evidence to sustain the convictions. As the court was the trier of fact we are bound in our review by the clearly erroneous rule, Maryland Rule 1086. In Edwards v. State, Memorandum on Motion For Reargument, 198 Md. 132, the Court of Appeals was asked how it could ever say that the trial court is clearly wrong. It said, at 159, “This question can only be answered as and when it is…