Legal Opinion

United States v. Mooney

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 30, 2000No. 99CR485PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

This Court has conducted an evidentiary hearing to consider whether defendant David Mooney (“Mooney”) “may presently be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable... to assist properly in his defense,” one of the criteria specified by 18 U.S.C. § 4241(a).1 To that end two witnesses testified: Psychologist Daniel Carlson, who is affiliated with FMC Rochester and studied Mooney during a period of observation and study at that institution, and private psychiatrist Richard…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Sidney HemsiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David John MURDOCH, Defendant-Appellant. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. James RosenheimerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MooneyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API