Legal Opinion

Lauderdale v. O'Neill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1918No. 9479PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Stephens County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Eliza Lauderdale against Bird E. O’Neill and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, C.

The plaintiff, Eliza Lauderdale, commenced this action in the district court of Stephens county against the 'defendants, Bird O’Neill. Elizabeth E. O’Neill, Annie Sparks, and the Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Company, a corporation, to recover an undivided one-half interest in certain lands lying in Stephens county, the same being the allotments of Julius Webster and Ella Webster.

The plaintiff claims title to the lands by inheritance. The plaintiff alleged that Julius Webster died intestate on the 7th day of February, 1905, seized and possessed of an allotment, and left as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnson v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Welch v. All PersonsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. O'Neill v. LauderdaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Beggs Oil Co. v. DeardorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Schaible v. HellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API