Legal Opinion

Hinman v. Clark

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to obtain continuing injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtDevbndobf, J.

Upon the plaintiff’s application, a temporary injunction was granted herein restraining defendants from destroying and tearing down two houses belonging to or in the possession of plaintiff and from interfering *254with the moving of sneh buildings through West Sixth street to lots on Montcalm street in the city of Oswego.

The object of this action is to obtain a permanent injunction substantially within the scope of the language of the temporary injunction. The plaintiff had a sufficient title or interest in said buildings, as appears by the evidence, to entitle him to maintain this action. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phelps v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Burke v. BurpoNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Providence Retreat v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hinman v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. People v. LewisNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API