Legal Opinion

Stuhr v. Oliver

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 22, 2010No. 09-1383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.

^Appellant Steve M. Stuhr, as administrator of the estate of Donald James Stuhr (“the Administrator”), appeals from the circuit court’s order, which denied the Administrator’s motion to be substituted as a party in Oliver’s annulment proceeding and granted Oliver’s motion to dismiss her petition for annulment. The Administrator asserts two points on appeal: (1) that the circuit court’s denial of Oliver’s annulment petition was clearly erroneous; and (2) that the circuit court’s denial of his motion to be substituted as the party in interest in the annulment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. CooperIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Arkansas Highway Police v. Crittenden County Prosecuting Attorney's OfficeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Porter v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Henderson v. RessorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  5. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. PerrinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Valois Dynasty, LLC v. City National BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API