Legal Opinion

Salem v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 9, 1960No. 38332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. “The discretion of the judges of the superior courts in all matters pertaining to contempt of their authority and mandates will never be controlled unless grossly abused.” Hayden v. Phinizy, 67 Ga. 758, 760, citing Howard v. Durand, 36 Ga. 346 (91 Am. Dec. 767); Smith v. Cook, 39 Ga. 191; and Thweatt v. Gammell, 56 Ga. 98.

2. “The purpose in punishment for criminal contempt is to preserve the power and vindicate the dignity of the court and to punish for disobedience of the court’s orders. Davis v. Davis, 138 Ga. 8 (1b) (74 S. E. 830); Carson v. Ennis, 146 Ga. 726, 728 (1)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Carson v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Howard v. DurandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crudup v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. In Re JeffersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Crudup v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Crudup v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API