Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Marsh

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The practice in the English Ecclesiastical Courts on a charge of adultery, either in the libel or in, the responsive allegation, is to set out circumstantially all the principal facts of the case as proposed to be proved. The libel states, also, the various acts of adultery intended to be relied on; when, where, and with whom committed. Dillon v. Dillon, 3 Curteis 86; Shelford on Mar. & D. 398.

The same degree of particularity has not been adopted in bills for divorce in this country. But it is settled that a general allegation that the defendant, within a specified time, *395has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  2. Church v. Mehitable ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mahne v. MahneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Mahne v. MahneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. C. v. C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API