Legal Opinion

Tile-Rite Co. v. Hartsuff

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County

Decided February 3, 1950No. 50Published

1Opinion of the Court

McCreary, P. J.,

The above-entitled action is a suit in assumpsit to recover for goods sold and delivered. At the trial held before a jury on October 18,1949, plaintiff established as fact, and it was admitted by defendant, that on May 27, 1948, Donald M. Edmonds, on behalf of A. & A. Heating Company, defendant, signed an order for the purchase of goods, directed to the Tile-Rite Company, plaintiff, a copy of which order is as follows:

*128“The Tile-Rite Company

5505 St. Clair St. “Cleveland, Ohio

Date: May 27, 1948

“Charge to A. & A. Heating Co.

Address: 232 Bridge St. Salesman: John Samko

Town: West…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wood & Brooks Co. v. D. E. Hewit Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Sheridan Coal Co. v. C. W. Hull Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. American Home Savings Bank Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Eckert v. SchochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Burwell & Dunn Co v. ChapmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API