Legal Opinion

Gladys Gardner v. GMAC, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 6, 2015No. 14-1048, 14-1049PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KEENAN joined.

DIAZ, Circuit Judge:

The main question raised by this appeal is when borrowers may seek a remedy after their creditors violate the repossession notice requirements in Maryland’s Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions (“CLEC”), Md.Code Ann., Com. Law § 12-1001 et seq. Because we conclude that CLEC requires borrowers to have repaid more than the original principal amount of their loans before they are entitled to relief, we affirm.

I

Gladys Gardner and Randolph Scott each entered into…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lyles v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Maryland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  3. Baugh v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
  4. Baxter v. Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  5. David McMillan, et al. v. Erie Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API