Gladys Gardner v. GMAC, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge KEENAN joined.
DIAZ, Circuit Judge:
The main question raised by this appeal is when borrowers may seek a remedy after their creditors violate the repossession notice requirements in Maryland’s Credit Grantor Closed End Credit Provisions (“CLEC”), Md.Code Ann., Com. Law § 12-1001 et seq. Because we conclude that CLEC requires borrowers to have repaid more than the original principal amount of their loans before they are entitled to relief, we affirm.
I
Gladys Gardner and Randolph Scott each entered into…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lyles v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Maryland v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Baugh v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Baxter v. Amerihome Mortgage Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- David McMillan, et al. v. Erie Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.