Legal Opinion
Rudolph v. Gleason
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 23, 1976No. 75-1290PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
339 So.2d 298 (1976)
Muriel RUDOLPH and Judith Male D/B/a Muriel Rudolph Associates, Appellants,
v.
Jackie GLEASON, an Individual, et al., Appellees.
No. 75-1290.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 23, 1976.
Storace, Hall & Hauser and Andrew M. Leinoff, Miami, for appellants.
Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal three adverse final judgments in this contract action and primarily urge as reversible error the denial of their motion for new trial. The ground for this motion was that defendant…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN TARPON SPRINGS v. BlissSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Concord Shopping Center, Inc. v. BookbinderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
4Cited by5 opinions
- Del Monte Banana Co. v. ChaconDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Colosimo v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Dozier v. HodgesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Metro. Dade Cty. v. Frank J. RooneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Singletary ex rel. Barnett Banks Trust Co. v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993